Site no longer supporterd

This site is no longer supported and will not be updated with new content. You are welcome to browse and download all content already included in the site. Please note you will have to register your email address to access the site. We expect to close the site down by December 2016.

You are here

DSM-IV alcohol dependence and drinking in the U.S. population: A risk analysis

Annals of Epidemiology November 1997, Volume 7, Pages 542–549

Abstract

PURPOSE:This paper examines the relationship between alcohol dependence according to the criteria found in the 4th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) of the American Psychiatric Association and drinking in the U.S. general population.

METHODS:The data set under analysis is the 1988 National Health Interview Survey, which interviewed a probability sample of 22,102 adult drinkers in the U.S. household population. The response rate was 86%.

RESULTS:Results indicate that there is a linear relationship between DSM-IV dependence and the mean number of drinks consumed per day, or the number of days drinking five or more glasses of alcohol in the past 12 months. Respondents who reported consuming five or more drinks in a day have about six times more chances of being dependent than respondents who did not report such pattern of drinking. Older drinkers are less at risk than younger drinkers.

CONCLUSIONS:There is a risk of alcohol dependence at relatively low volumes of consumption. The risk increases gradually with the volume of consumption. An added and higher risk exists when drinkers engage in a pattern of consumption involving the ingestion of five or more drinks per day.

Keywords: Alcohol Dependence, Drinking, Risk, General Population.

References

  • 1. G Grant, T Harford. The relationship between ethanol intake and DSM-III alcohol dependence. J Studies Alcohol. 1990;51:448-456
  • 2. R Caetano. Findings from the 1984 National Survey of alcohol use among U.S. Hispanics. WB Clark, ME Hilton (Eds.) Alcohol in America: Drinking Practices and Problems (State University of New York Press, Albany, 1991) 293-308
  • 3. B Muthen, B Grant, D Hasin. Subgroup Differences in Factor Structure for DSM-III-R and Proposed DSM-IV Criteria for Alcohol abuse and Dependence in the 1988 National Health Survey. (UCLA, Graduate School of Education, Los Angeles, 1992)
  • 4. W Hall, JB Saunders, TF Bador, OG Aasland, A Amundsen, R Hodgson, et al. The structure and correlates of alcohol dependence: WHO collaborative project on the early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-III. Addiction. 1993;88:1627-1636
  • 5. American Psychiatric Association. DSM-IV Draft Criteria. (American Psychiatric Association, Washington, DC, 1993)
  • 6. World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. (World Health Organization, Geneva, 1992)
  • 7. DA Dawson, LD Archer. Relative frequency of heavy drinking and the risk of alcohol dependence. Addiction. 1993;88:1509-1518
  • 8. L Midanik, T Tam, TK Greenfield, R Caetano. On taking risks. Addiction. 1996;91(10):1439-1456
  • 9. R Caetano, TW Tam. Prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV and ICD-10 alcohol dependence: 1990 U.S. National Alcohol Survey. Alcohol Alcoholism. 1995;30(2):177-186
  • 10. G Edwards, H Holder (Eds.) Alcohol and Public Policy: Evidence and Issues (Oxford University Press, New York, 1995)
  • 11. P Anderson, A Cremona, A Paton, C Turner, P Wallace. The risk of alcohol. Addiction. 1993;88:1493-1508
  • 12. Royal College of Psychiatrists. Alcohol: Our Favorite Drug. (Tavistock Publications, London, 1986)
  • 13. RE Kendell. Drinking sensibly. Br J Add. 1987;82:1279-1288
  • 14. D Hawks. Is it possible to recommend safe drinking levels without increasing per capita consumption? Another aspect of the prevention paradox. Br J Add. 1989;84:371-375
  • 15. K Mäkelä, H Mustonen. Positive and negative experience related to drinking as a function of annual alcohol intake. Br J Add. 1988;83:403-408
  • 16. R Hauge, O Irgens-Jensen. The relationship between alcohol consumption, alcohol intoxication, and negative consequences of drinking in four Scandinavian countries. Br J Add. 1986;81:513-524
  • 17. R Room, S Bondy, J Ferris. The risk of harm to oneself from drinking, Canada 1989. Addiction. 1995;90:499-513
  • 18. R Caetano. Comments on the creation of a Latin American society for biomedical research. Workshop in Alcohol Research in Latin America: Enhancing Scientific Communication and Collaboration Washington, DC (, November 6–7 1993)
  • 19. JT Massey, TF Moore, W Parsons Tadros. Design and estimation from the national health interview survey—1985–1994. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat. 1989;2(110):1-33
  • 20. Research Triangle Institute. Software for survey data analysis (SUDAAN), Version 6.30. (Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, 1994)
  • 21. American Psychiatric Association. 2nd ed in: DSM-IV: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. (American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C, 1994)
  • 22. R Room. Measuring alcohol consumption in the U.S.: Methods and rationales. W Clark, M Hilton (Eds.) Alcohol in America (State University of New York Press, Albany, 1991) 26-50
  • 23. National Health and Medical Research Council. Is There a Safe Level of Daily Consumption of Alcohol for Men and Women: Recommendations Regarding Responsible Drinking Behaviour. (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1987)
  • 24. Surgeon General. 2nd ed in: Report on Nutrition and Health. (Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C, 1988)
  • 25. ME Hilton. The demographic distribution of drinking problems in 1984. WB Clark, M Hilton (Eds.) Alcohol in America: Drinking Practices and Problems in a National Survey (State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1991) 87-101
  • 26. G Knupfer. The risks of drunkenness (or ebrietas resurrecta): a comparison of frequent intoxication indices and of population subsgroups as to problem risks. Br J Add. 1984;79:185-196
  • 27. G Edwards, MM Gross. Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome. Br Med J. 1976;1:1058-1061

Footnotes

From the Alcohol Research Group, 2000 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, CA, USA

Address reprint requests to: Dr. Raul Caetano, Alcohol Research Group, 2000 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94709.

Work on this paper was supported by a National Alcohol Research Center Grant (AA-05595) from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism to the Alcohol Research Group, Western Consortium for Public Health, 2000 Hearst Avenue, Berkeley, CA 94709.

Editor's Comment:
This paper examines the relationship between alcohol dependence according to the criteria found in DSM-IV, and drinking in the US general population. In the survey conducted, respondents who reported consuming five or more drinks per day were about six times more at risk of being alcohol dependent than those who did not report such drinking patterns. Studying the appearance of dependence indicators at low levels of drinking may help identifying subgroups of drinkers who may be more sensitive to alcohol and thus more at risk for developing dependence, and may help in understanding more about the course of dependence – how it begins and how it changes with time and amount of drinking. Once the alcohol dependence syndrome is installed, chronically dependent individuals may not need high levels of prolonged periods of consumption to present a full-blown syndrome of dependence.

Share

Notify your friends and contacts about this Progress in Mind Resource Centre, with free access to excellent content.

 

 

 

Meet the Steering Committee

Search this site

Search form

Resource centre

Presentation by David Nutt

This Resource Centre has been made possible by Lundbeck. Note that Lundbeck has no editorial control or influence over the content of this Resource Centre. The Resource Centre and all content therein have been subject to an independent editorial review.